Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Valediction v. Conjoined!

(super horrible, sorry huge thing popped up!)

In “Conjoined” by Judith Minty and Valediction: Forbidding Mourning by John Donne the authors contrast one another in idealism of marriage and love but, use devices of literature similarly to an extent. Conjoined by Judith Minty describes the pain of being stuck within a relationship, in this case marriage. In contrast Valediction the author describes the relationship as a beautiful thing but something that must deteriorate with no mourning. Judith Minty uses metaphors and selection of detail to convey the horrible thing the marriage has made them become. Similarly John Donne uses similes and metaphors to show a different perspective of the beautiful connection that must wither away.
The differences between the poems are obvious however there are many similarities between the two authors in use of metaphor to convey their point. In Conjoined Judith Minty used metaphors in her comparison of the morphed Onion to her and her companion. The skin of the onion being their marriage holding the two pieces of the onion as an example within the text she states “do you feel the skin that binds us”. The two pieces of the onion are metaphors for their splitting personalities. Judith Minty in Conjoined uses selection of detail to show the horrible morphed thing her marriage has become, she compares her marriage to “two headed calf rooted in one body, fighting to suck at its mother’s teats” she goes further to compare her marriage to “those other freaks, Chang and Eng.” Judith uses these to compare them to her “conjoined” marriage something that can’ be split for it “might kill the other”. This comparison shows the freakish nature of the relationship and the pain that it must incur as the “calf rooted in one body fight to suck”. In addition in the beginning of the stanza she asks him if “Do you feel the skin that binds us… as we move heavy in this house?” Comparing her one husband to a hated transcendental man that pays no attention to their marriage she attacks men with “men don’t slice onions in the kitchen” showing the authors possible feminist roots.
Similarly In Valediction John Donne uses metaphors however in his piece he uses them to strengthen the ideal of beauty and the cosmic nature of his relationship. An example of a Metaphor he uses would be “trepidation of the spheres though greater far, is innocent” showing the strength of his relationship something celestial not mere “dull sublunary lovers’ love” to which “moving of th’earth brings harm and fears”. In addition to this John Donne uses metaphors to describe the spiritual connection he keeps with his lover. In the sixth stanza he explains the separation of the two lovers that they must “endure not yet a breach, but expansion.” He describes here the stretching of their two souls when the two lovers are apart rather than the breaking.
In contrast to the similarities of the figurative language, both authors use different devices that further separate the pieces showing the differences in author. Judith Minty uses tone to add a distorted dimension to the piece. The tone of the piece is shown as a horrible, painful situation that is completely unnatural and alien to anything that is the norm. She shows this through the diction of the piece stating their connection as “bind”, and to split it would be to “sever”. She utilizes death to further emphasize the tone of the piece “might kill the other” this emphasizes her disgust of the other. She uses symbolism in the Onion describing the “each half round, then flat and deformed where it pressed and gew against the other”. This quote shows that if this skin was not there forcing together the pieces of the Onion they would easily split apart. However the skin being the marriage holding them together forcing them to be in this unnatural relationship.
In contrast to Judith Minty’s perception of marriage and relationship, John Donne uses similes and symbolism to portray his delusional state of love with another. The author uses similes to compare his relationship to a compass that “as stiff twin compasses are two thy soul the fixt foot makes no show to move but doth if th’other do” further strengthening the connection between him and his lover. John Donne uses symbolism throughout the piece that has already been mentioned. Throughout the piece he compares his love to many things both celestial and lunar. The comparison of his relationship expands from virtuous men, to planets, souls, gold, and a compass all to further strengthen the inseparable nature of his relationship.
Each author holds their own view of one of the most discussed topics within literature that being, Love. In the poems Conjoined by Judith Minty and the A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning these two topics are shown as complete polar opposites. However each author utilizes similar and contrasting techniques of figurative language to convey their point.

2 comments:

  1. Ok. To start with I thought your introduction was good. You got right to the point and said what the poems were about, how they contrasted each other, and what literary devices they used. The only thing I would change is that maybe you should address more figurative language than just similes and metaphors. Like personification, diction, and there is another one on the edge of my brain that I can't access. Anyway, just try to use more.

    In your next few paragraphs, I think you have a good understanding of the poems and read into them deeply, but be careful in using the same quotations more than once. In the first paragraph alone you used two quotes two times, granted they were to make different points, but try to use other quotes if you are going to try and make so many points.

    I think you analyzed your quotes very well. After you would include a quote, or even sometimes before, you would state what the quote provided to the argument, and I understood mostly every point you were trying to make with the inclusion of the quotations.

    I have to give you credit for analyzing both authors' uses of similes and metaphors, there were indeed a substantial amount of them in both poems. However, I think you could have used more than just those two. In fact I think that i really the only major fault I found in your essay, that there were not enough types of figurative language that you referred to.

    I did not find any misinterpretations. I think you understood what the poems were about and how they used metaphors and similes.
    **********************************************
    How is personification and onomatopoeia used in the poems, if at all, and how can you relate it to your argument?

    Are there any other sections from the poem that you could include that would be prudent to include?

    Is it possible that the poem conjoined is not about marriage, and if so then how can it relate to your argument?

    ReplyDelete
  2. LOL well it's from what Jessica wrote. okay, well i do agree with that she said before and the fact that you used those figuartive. and i can why Jessica said that. she wants you to use more so that'll help describe the whole situation more...maybe it be better too. OR it could make more sense of what you could say or it'll just fill in more space. :D but it's your call Pavin. i will not doubt you for this kind of thing. i can understand you perfectly well because we're asians. and i understand. LOL

    WOW! nice job on the first body paragraph. Very thoughtful and that was cool. you used the same quote twice and it pointed out two things. Hey good job on that. i'm very glad to see you do this. well i can't get my mind off of this. i just can't believe you've did this. i mean i wouldn't do it. but yeah man! That was so sick SHIT! i mean with what you meant with the quotes. it totally made those two poems into magic. i mean i understood what you've said. or Maybe it's just that we're so asian and it made sense from the start. OMG! dude Pavin we are so amazing! i mean i'm not even writing about that essay of yours. i'm just so happy that i've meet you. LOL. I mean we are so cool and awesome. the best things come out from us. okay back to what i'm supposed to do....well i didn't find any mistakes because i took everything and totally corrected it in my head...so everything made sense. cause we're so asian and we do understand each others' work. LOL
    Questions? ummm i don't have any so that's the case.
    well Pavin good job! i enjoy what you've wrote :D and i'll see you later

    ReplyDelete